Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

46.1k citations
902 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

790 papers receiving 42.1k citations

Peers

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 31.0k
  • Molecular Medicine 1.1k
  • Speech and Hearing 1.3k
  • Emergency Medical Services 1.0k
  • Epidemiology 4.2k
Replace VA Western New York Healthcare System with:
VA Western New York Healthcare System United States
Maryland Medical Research Institute United States
Clinical Research Management United States
Ortho Clinical Diagnostics (United States) United States
Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program Canada
Biostatistical Consulting (United States) United States
Saint Peter's University Hospital United States
Trudeau Institute United States
Johns Hopkins Children's Center United States
American Society of Clinical Oncology United States
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation relative to VA Western New York Healthcare System United States VA Western New York Healthcare System's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
VA Western New York Healthcare System · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Cystic Fibrosis Foundation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cystic Fibrosis Foundation more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation at the time of their publication.

About Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation have published 902 papers, which have received a total of 46.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 657 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 29 papers in Speech and Hearing, 19 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 7 papers in Transplantation and 36 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (616 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (146 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (100 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (39 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (35 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (34 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (31 papers) and Respiratory viral infections research (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (31.0k citations), Molecular Medicine (1.1k citations), Speech and Hearing (1.3k citations), Emergency Medical Services (1.0k citations) and Epidemiology (4.2k citations). Authors at Cystic Fibrosis Foundation collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Italy and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, Pediatric Pulmonology, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Annals of the American Thoracic Society and The Journal of Pediatrics. Some of Cystic Fibrosis Foundation's most productive authors include Bruce C. Marshall, Stacey C. FitzSimmons, Steven Mark Rowe, Eric J. Sorscher, Christopher Hooper Goss, Karen Robinson, Frank J. Accurso, Nicole Mayer-Hamblett, Bonnie W. Ramsey and Jonathan H. Widdicombe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact