National Academy of Sciences

63.6k citations
2.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Academy of Sciences

2.3k papers receiving 52.2k citations

Peers

National Academy of Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Parasitology 1.2k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 2.3k
  • Environmental Engineering 2.3k
  • General Health Professions 3.6k
  • Health Information Management 694
Replace University of the Sciences with:
University of the Sciences United States
Bucknell University United States
Bayer (United States) United States
Office of Science United States
University of New Haven United States
Rogers (United States) United States
Long Island University United States
Union College United States
Manchester University United States
Lafayette College United States
National Academy of Sciences relative to University of the Sciences United States University of the Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
University of the Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Academy of Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication.

About National Academy of Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Academy of Sciences have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 63.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 75 papers in General Materials Science, 125 papers in Numerical Analysis, 215 papers in Applied Mathematics, 40 papers in Metals and Alloys and 361 papers in Mechanics of Materials on the topics of Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (180 papers), Elasticity and Wave Propagation (107 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (106 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (81 papers), Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability (81 papers), Material Properties and Applications (69 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (58 papers) and Structural mechanics and materials (49 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Parasitology (1.2k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (2.3k citations), Environmental Engineering (2.3k citations), General Health Professions (3.6k citations) and Health Information Management (694 citations). Authors at National Academy of Sciences collaborate with scholars in United States, Ukraine and Russia and have published in prestigious journals including Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Materials Science, Nature and The Astrophysical Journal. Some of National Academy of Sciences's most productive authors include Chaomei Chen, Peter D. Blair, Ronald Earle Miller, Ruth Ellen Bulger, Kathleen N Lohr, Vitaly V. Pavlishchuk, Anthony William Addison, Marilyn J. Field, Bruce Alberts and Robert S. Ledley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact