Universidade Lusófona do Porto

6.9k citations
713 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Media Studies and Communication 22
    • Journalism and Media Studies 17
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence 33

Universidade Lusófona do Porto

610 papers receiving 6.9k citations

Peers

Universidade Lusófona do Porto
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Mechanics of Materials 2k
  • Clinical Psychology 597
  • Health 210
  • General Materials Science 62
  • Demography 222
Replace Universidade Politécnica da Guarda with:
Universidade Politécnica da Guarda Portugal
Centro de Estudos em Educação Tecnologia e Saúde Portugal
Universidade Politécnica de Portalegre Portugal
Universidade Politécnica de Tomar Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia Portugal
EURECAT Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya Spain
Catholic University of Ávila Spain
Lusíada University of Lisbon Portugal
Instituto Piaget Portugal
Instituto Superior da Maia Portugal
Universidade Lusófona do Porto relative to Universidade Politécnica da Guarda Portugal Universidade Politécnica da Guarda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Universidade Politécnica da Guarda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Lusófona do Porto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Lusófona do Porto. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Lusófona do Porto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Lusófona do Porto more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Lusófona do Porto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Lusófona do Porto at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Lusófona do Porto at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Lusófona do Porto

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Lusófona do Porto have published 713 papers, which have received a total of 6.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 44 papers in Communication, 35 papers in Health, 4 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 68 papers in Clinical Psychology and 29 papers in Gender Studies on the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (33 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (25 papers), Media Studies and Communication (22 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (20 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (20 papers), Journalism and Media Studies (17 papers), Physical Activity and Health (15 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Mechanics of Materials (2k citations), Clinical Psychology (597 citations), Health (210 citations), General Materials Science (62 citations) and Demography (222 citations). Authors at Universidade Lusófona do Porto collaborate with scholars in Portugal, Spain and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Trauma Violence & Abuse, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Sustainability and Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. Some of Universidade Lusófona do Porto's most productive authors include Raul Campilho, Lucas da Silva, Mariana Doina Banea, Arnaldo G. Pinto, Diogo Jorge Pereira do Vale Lamela, Bárbara Figueiredo, João Arménio Lamego Lopes, Célia R. Oliveira, Olga Soares Cunha and Inês Jongenelen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact