Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

15.3k papers receiving 172.1k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
  • Forestry 7.6k
  • Soil Science 13.2k
  • Plant Science 49.5k
  • Aquatic Science 8.2k
  • Insect Science 13.5k
Replace Universidade Federal da Paraíba with:
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brazil
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
Universidade Federal do Ceará Brazil
Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Brazil
Universidade Federal de Alagoas Brazil
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido Brazil
Universidade Federal do Piauí Brazil
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba Brazil
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz Brazil
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco relative to Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brazil Universidade Federal da Paraíba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Universidade Federal da Paraíba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco have published 17.9k papers, which have received a total of 181.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.0k papers in Forestry, 1.6k papers in Soil Science, 1.2k papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 4.4k papers in Plant Science and 1.3k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Soil Management and Crop Yield (1.2k papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (1.2k papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (667 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (594 papers), Plant and animal studies (591 papers), Environmental and biological studies (559 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (519 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (491 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (7.6k citations), Soil Science (13.2k citations), Plant Science (49.5k citations), Aquatic Science (8.2k citations) and Insect Science (13.5k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Horticultura Brasileira and Tropical Animal Health and Production. Some of Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco's most productive authors include Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Gauss M. Cordeiro, Clístenes Williams Araújo do Nascimento, Jorge B. Torres, Leonie Asfora Sarubbo, Elcida de Lima Araújo, Maria Jesus Nogueira Rodal, Edwin M. M. Ortega, Ana Lúcia Figueiredo Porto and Fábio Hissa Vieira Hazin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact