Horticultura Brasileira

2.3k papers and 19.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Horticultura Brasileira in the last decades have received a total of 19.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Horticultura Brasileira usually cover Plant Science (2.1k papers), Soil Science (474 papers) and Molecular Biology (325 papers) specifically the topics of Growth and nutrition in plants (1.1k papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (449 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (242 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Horticultura Brasileira are Perla A. Gómez, G. M. de Resende, Arthur Bernardes Cecílio Filho, Antônio Ismael Inácio Cardoso, Leila Trevisan Braz, Juliano Tadeu Vilela de Resende, Francisco Bezerra Neto, Paulo Cézar Rezende Fontes, Maria Zuleide de Negreiros and Jean Carlos Cardoso.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Horticultura Brasileira

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Horticultura Brasileira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Horticultura Brasileira.

Countries where authors publish in Horticultura Brasileira

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Horticultura Brasileira. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Horticultura Brasileira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Horticultura Brasileira more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025