Universidade Federal do Ceará

32.8k papers receiving 487.2k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal do Ceará
Comparison fields: 5 of 250
  • Biological Psychiatry 5.9k
  • Food Science 34.6k
  • Plant Science 61.2k
  • Biochemistry 9.0k
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 11.2k
Replace Universidade Federal de Pernambuco with:
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brazil
Universidade Federal da Bahia Brazil
Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil
Universidade Federal do Piauí Brazil
Universidade de Brasília Brazil
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Brazil
Universidade Federal de Alagoas Brazil
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
Universidade Federal do Ceará relative to Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil Universidade Federal de Pernambuco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal do Ceará

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal do Ceará. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal do Ceará with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal do Ceará more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal do Ceará

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Ceará at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal do Ceará at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal do Ceará

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal do Ceará have published 39.6k papers, which have received a total of 528.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 883 papers in Forestry, 194 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 974 papers in Information Systems and Management, 80 papers in Computational Mathematics and 1.2k papers in Soil Science on the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (1.1k papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (1.0k papers), Business and Management Studies (910 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (765 papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (695 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (690 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (648 papers) and Science and Education Research (602 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (5.9k citations), Food Science (34.6k citations), Plant Science (61.2k citations), Biochemistry (9.0k citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (11.2k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal do Ceará collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Ciência Agronômica/Revista ciência agronômica, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Acta Paulista de Enfermagem and PLoS ONE. Some of Universidade Federal do Ceará's most productive authors include Fabiano A.N. Fernandes, Suelí Rodrigues, A. G. Souza Filho, Hans J. Herrmann, José S. Andrade, Jörg Heukelbach, André F. Carvalho, Daniel Benevides da Costa, A. S. B. Sombra and Luciana Rocha Barros Gonçalves.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact