Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Impact in
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics top 1%
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
- Plant Science 3.8k
- Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications 618
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 446
- Top scholars
- Marcelo TabarelliGauss M. CordeiroOscar L. MaltaMonica Ferreira da CostaFrancisco Cribari‐NetoCid Bartolomeu de AraujoS. M. RezendeUlysses Paulino Albuquerque
- Journals
- Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (273 papers)PLoS ONE (224 papers)Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (197 papers)Zootaxa (188 papers)Journal of South American Earth Sciences (181 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
48.6k papers receiving 687.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2.4k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 17.6k
- Plant Science 57.3k
- Pollution 15.9k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 21.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal de Pernambuco more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at the time of their publication.
About Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pernambuco have published 55.6k papers, which have received a total of 687.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 116 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 3.8k papers in Plant Science, 38 papers in General Dentistry, 1.5k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 535 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (618 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (571 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (501 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (498 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (477 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (446 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (393 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (392 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (17.6k citations), Plant Science (57.3k citations), Pollution (15.9k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (21.1k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, PLoS ONE, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Zootaxa and Journal of South American Earth Sciences. Some of Universidade Federal de Pernambuco's most productive authors include Marcelo Tabarelli, Gauss M. Cordeiro, Oscar L. Malta, Monica Ferreira da Costa, Francisco Cribari‐Neto, Cid Bartolomeu de Araujo, S. M. Rezende, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque, Marcelo dos Santos Guerra and Adiel Teixeira de Almeida.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.