Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

37.3k papers receiving 507.7k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 22.7k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 31.3k
  • Statistics and Probability 13.0k
  • Plant Science 54.1k
Replace Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco with:
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Brazil
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
Universidade Federal de Alagoas Brazil
Universidade Federal do Ceará Brazil
Universidade Federal da Bahia Brazil
Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Brazil
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Brazil
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco relative to Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Brazil Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.8×
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal de Pernambuco more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal de Pernambuco have published 45.0k papers, which have received a total of 544.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.1k papers in Information Systems and Management, 131 papers in Acoustics and Ultrasonics, 559 papers in Forestry, 683 papers in Urban Studies and 1.4k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Plant and animal studies (996 papers), Business and Management Studies (975 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (775 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (757 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (677 papers), Geography and Environmental Studies (677 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (569 papers) and Software Engineering Research (539 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (22.7k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (31.3k citations), Statistics and Probability (13.0k citations) and Plant Science (54.1k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal de Pernambuco collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Zootaxa, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva and Journal of South American Earth Sciences. Some of Universidade Federal de Pernambuco's most productive authors include Marcelo Tabarelli, Gauss M. Cordeiro, Mônica F. Costa, Francisco Cribari‐Neto, Cid B. de Araújo, Marcelo Guerra, S. M. Rezende, Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, Silvia L. P. Ferrari and Oscar L. Malta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact