Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

14.3k papers receiving 134.8k citations

Peers

Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Forestry 2.9k
  • Soil Science 6.0k
  • Biomaterials 7.6k
  • Food Science 9.8k
  • Plant Science 19.1k
Replace Universidade Federal de Pernambuco with:
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte Brazil
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brazil
Universidade Federal do Ceará Brazil
Universidade Federal de Alagoas Brazil
Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil
Universidade Federal da Bahia Brazil
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco Brazil
Universidade Federal do Piauí Brazil
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba Brazil
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande relative to Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Brazil Universidade Federal de Pernambuco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Federal de Campina Grande. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Federal de Campina Grande with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Federal de Campina Grande more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Campina Grande at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Federal de Campina Grande at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Federal de Campina Grande have published 17.2k papers, which have received a total of 141.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 929 papers in Forestry, 945 papers in Soil Science, 2.5k papers in Plant Science, 782 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 863 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Growth and nutrition in plants (1.3k papers), Agricultural and Food Sciences (837 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (592 papers), Environmental and biological studies (532 papers), Geography and Environmental Studies (515 papers), Multilevel Inverters and Converters (465 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (358 papers) and Environmental Sustainability and Education (352 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Forestry (2.9k citations), Soil Science (6.0k citations), Biomaterials (7.6k citations), Food Science (9.8k citations) and Plant Science (19.1k citations). Authors at Universidade Federal de Campina Grande collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Defect and diffusion forum/Diffusion and defect data, solid state data. Part A, Defect and diffusion forum, Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental and Physics Letters B. Some of Universidade Federal de Campina Grande's most productive authors include Claudianor O. Alves, Cursino B. Jacobina, Franklin Riet-Corrêa, Vicente de Paulo Rodrigues da Silva, A.M.N. Lima, E.R.C. da Silva, Hans Raj Gheyi, Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes, Antônio Gilson Barbosa de Lima and Gelmires de Araújo Neves.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact