University of Arizona
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.05%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Planetary Science and Exploration
- Atmospheric Science top 0.2%
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 4.1k
- Astro and Planetary Science 4k
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 3.3k
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 1.8k
- Planetary Science and Exploration 1.6k
- Instrumentation 1.2k
- Top scholars
- Eugene Wimberly MyersJian‐Kang ZhuWebb MillerDavid J. LipmanStephen F. AltschulWarren R. GishRobert F. LuschALFREDO R. HUETE
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (4.4k papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1.4k papers)Icarus (1.2k papers)The Astronomical Journal (1.1k papers)Applied Optics (977 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
University of Arizona
163.6k papers receiving 7.1M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 863.2k
- Atmospheric Science 171k
- Geophysics 154.9k
- Global and Planetary Change 221.2k
- Ecology 190.7k
Countries citing scholars working at University of Arizona
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Arizona. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Arizona with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Arizona more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Arizona
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Arizona at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Arizona at the time of their publication.
About University of Arizona
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Arizona have published 170.9k papers, which have received a total of 7.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 16.4k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1.2k papers in Instrumentation, 3.5k papers in Atmospheric Science, 7.1k papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 1.9k papers in Paleontology on the topics of Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4.1k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (4k papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3.3k papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (1.8k papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1.8k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.7k papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (1.6k papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.2k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (863.2k citations), Atmospheric Science (171k citations), Geophysics (154.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (221.2k citations) and Ecology (190.7k citations). Authors at University of Arizona collaborate with scholars in United States, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Icarus, The Astronomical Journal and Applied Optics. Some of University of Arizona's most productive authors include Eugene Wimberly Myers, Jian‐Kang Zhu, Webb Miller, David J. Lipman, Stephen F. Altschul, Warren R. Gish, Robert F. Lusch, ALFREDO R. HUETE, Stephen Louis Vargo and Bernard J. Jaworski.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.