University of Arizona
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.05%
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Planetary Science and Exploration
- Instrumentation top 0.05%
Papers in
-
- Astro and Planetary Science 5.7k
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 4.9k
- Planetary Science and Exploration 3.5k
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 3.3k
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2.7k
- Instrumentation 2.7k
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 2.5k
- Top scholars
- Jian‐Kang ZhuEugene W. MyersWebb MillerWarren GishStephen F. AltschulDavid J. LipmanAlfredo HueteBernard J. Jaworski
- Journals
- The Astrophysical Journal (2.9k papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1.2k papers)Icarus (1.1k papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (793 papers)The Astronomical Journal (750 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
University of Arizona
149.0k papers receiving 5.9M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 490.1k
- Instrumentation 85.3k
- Atmospheric Science 358.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 373.8k
- Geophysics 193.6k
Countries citing scholars working at University of Arizona
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Arizona. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Arizona with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Arizona more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Arizona
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Arizona at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Arizona at the time of their publication.
About University of Arizona
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Arizona have published 166.5k papers, which have received a total of 6.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 13.5k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2.7k papers in Instrumentation, 7.6k papers in Atmospheric Science, 6.8k papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2.3k papers in Paleontology on the topics of Astro and Planetary Science (5.7k papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4.9k papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (3.5k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3.4k papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (3.3k papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2.7k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (2.5k papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2.3k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Astronomy and Astrophysics (490.1k citations), Instrumentation (85.3k citations), Atmospheric Science (358.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (373.8k citations) and Geophysics (193.6k citations). Authors at University of Arizona collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Icarus, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Astronomical Journal. Some of University of Arizona's most productive authors include Jian‐Kang Zhu, Eugene W. Myers, Webb Miller, Warren Gish, Stephen F. Altschul, David J. Lipman, Alfredo Huete, Bernard J. Jaworski, Roy Parker and Robert F. Lusch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.