University of California, Los Angeles
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 4.8k
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics 4.1k
- Astro and Planetary Science 3.5k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 10.5k
- Top scholars
- Peter M. BentlerLi‐tze HuJudea PearlSteve HorvathStanley OsherTomas GanzK. N. HoukTerence Tao
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2.5k papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1.9k papers)PLoS ONE (1.8k papers)Science (1.4k papers)Physical Review Letters (1.4k papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
University of California, Los Angeles
242.2k papers receiving 12.4M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Cognitive Neuroscience 661.6k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 594.2k
- Molecular Biology 2.2M
- Psychiatry and Mental health 387.2k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 96.4k
Countries citing scholars working at University of California, Los Angeles
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of California, Los Angeles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of California, Los Angeles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of California, Los Angeles more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of California, Los Angeles
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles at the time of their publication.
About University of California, Los Angeles
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles have published 272.4k papers, which have received a total of 13.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 11.2k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10.5k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9.7k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 34.7k papers in Molecular Biology and 6.3k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4.8k papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (4.1k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3.5k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3.4k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2.6k papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (2.3k papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2.2k papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (661.6k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (594.2k citations), Molecular Biology (2.2M citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (387.2k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (96.4k citations). Authors at University of California, Los Angeles collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE, Science and Physical Review Letters. Some of University of California, Los Angeles's most productive authors include Peter M. Bentler, Li‐tze Hu, Judea Pearl, Steve Horvath, Stanley Osher, Tomas Ganz, K. N. Houk, Terence Tao, Bruce Dunn and Richard B. Kaner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.