University of California, Los Angeles
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Molecular Biology top 0.05%
Papers in
-
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 4.5k
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics 3.8k
- Astro and Planetary Science 3.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 10.9k
- Top scholars
- Peter M. BentlerLi‐tze HuJudea PearlSteve HorvathTomas GanzStanley OsherK. N. HoukTerence Tao
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2.4k papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1.8k papers)PLoS ONE (1.7k papers)Physical Review Letters (1.4k papers)Geophysical Research Letters (1.4k papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
University of California, Los Angeles
238.9k papers receiving 12.1M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Cognitive Neuroscience 656.2k
- Molecular Biology 2.2M
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 577.3k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 429.9k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 100.7k
Countries citing scholars working at University of California, Los Angeles
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of California, Los Angeles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of California, Los Angeles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of California, Los Angeles more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of California, Los Angeles
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles at the time of their publication.
About University of California, Los Angeles
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles have published 254.0k papers, which have received a total of 12.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 10.4k papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10.9k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9.8k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 35.3k papers in Molecular Biology and 7.3k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health on the topics of Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4.5k papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (3.8k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3.4k papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3.3k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3.2k papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2.8k papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2.2k papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (2.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Cognitive Neuroscience (656.2k citations), Molecular Biology (2.2M citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (577.3k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (429.9k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (100.7k citations). Authors at University of California, Los Angeles collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE, Physical Review Letters and Geophysical Research Letters. Some of University of California, Los Angeles's most productive authors include Peter M. Bentler, Li‐tze Hu, Judea Pearl, Steve Horvath, Tomas Ganz, Stanley Osher, K. N. Houk, Terence Tao, Bruce Dunn and Richard B. Kaner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.