Suffolk University

110.9k citations
4.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Suffolk University

3.6k papers receiving 100.5k citations

Peers

Suffolk University
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 12.7k
  • Marketing 7.3k
  • Strategy and Management 11.4k
  • Business and International Management 1.4k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 5.0k
Replace Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center with:
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center United States
Pace University United States
Hofstra University United States
State Street (United States) United States
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth United States
University of New Hampshire at Manchester United States
Clark University United States
Fordham University United States
Bentley University United States
St. John's University United States
Suffolk University relative to Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center United States Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Suffolk University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Suffolk University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Suffolk University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Suffolk University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Suffolk University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Suffolk University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Suffolk University at the time of their publication.

About Suffolk University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Suffolk University have published 4.3k papers, which have received a total of 110.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 285 papers in Accounting, 256 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 34 papers in Equine, 416 papers in Clinical Psychology and 317 papers in Strategy and Management on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (173 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (107 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (106 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (90 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (82 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (68 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (67 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (67 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (12.7k citations), Marketing (7.3k citations), Strategy and Management (11.4k citations), Business and International Management (1.4k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (5.0k citations). Authors at Suffolk University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Veterinary Record, Equine Veterinary Journal, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Business Research and PLoS ONE. Some of Suffolk University's most productive authors include Michael B. Arthur, Susan M. Orsillo, Giana M. Eckhardt, Robert DeFillippi, Boas Shamir, Robert James House, Fleura Bardhi, Lizabeth Roemer, Richard Y. Wang and Alasdair S. Roberts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact