National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture
About
In The Last Decade
National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture
2.7k papers receiving 60.3k citations
Fields of papers published by authors at National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture at the time of their publication.
Countries citing scholars working at National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.