Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 405
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 491
- Top scholars
- Daniele SilvestroMarco ThinesIngo MichalakRobert Brian O’HaraKatrin Böhning‐GaeseMatthias SchleuningThomas HicklerThomas Mueller
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (68 papers)Journal of Biogeography (51 papers)Mycological Progress (49 papers)Global Ecology and Biogeography (42 papers)Nature Communications (39 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
2.5k papers receiving 117.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- Ecological Modeling 16.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 26.2k
- Ecology 36.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 26.5k
- Global and Planetary Change 28.0k
Countries citing scholars working at Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre at the time of their publication.
About Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre have published 2.7k papers, which have received a total of 122.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 405 papers in Ecological Modeling, 603 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 676 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 801 papers in Ecology and 198 papers in Paleontology on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (491 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (405 papers), Plant and animal studies (334 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (283 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (233 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (170 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (163 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (134 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (16.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (26.2k citations), Ecology (36.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (26.5k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (28.0k citations). Authors at Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of Biogeography, Mycological Progress, Global Ecology and Biogeography and Nature Communications. Some of Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre's most productive authors include Daniele Silvestro, Marco Thines, Ingo Michalak, Robert Brian O’Hara, Katrin Böhning‐Gaese, Matthias Schleuning, Thomas Hickler, Thomas Mueller, Markus Pfenninger and ANDREAS MULCH.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.