Research Institute for Nature and Forest
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 498
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 175
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 253
- Top scholars
- Martin HermyOlivier HonnayBart MuysHans JacquemynKris VerheyenCajo J. F. ter BraakRein BrysSteve Juggins
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (44 papers)The Science of The Total Environment (43 papers)Biological Conservation (39 papers)Journal of Ecology (36 papers)Journal of Vegetation Science (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Research Institute for Nature and Forest
1.9k papers receiving 77.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 24.7k
- Ecological Modeling 8.3k
- Ecology 26.6k
- Global and Planetary Change 21.8k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 15.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Research Institute for Nature and Forest
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Research Institute for Nature and Forest. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Research Institute for Nature and Forest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Institute for Nature and Forest more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Research Institute for Nature and Forest
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Research Institute for Nature and Forest at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Research Institute for Nature and Forest at the time of their publication.
About Research Institute for Nature and Forest
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Research Institute for Nature and Forest have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 80.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 757 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 253 papers in Ecological Modeling, 732 papers in Ecology, 528 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 444 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (498 papers), Plant and animal studies (278 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (253 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (175 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (166 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (134 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (121 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (103 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (24.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (8.3k citations), Ecology (26.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (21.8k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (15.2k citations). Authors at Research Institute for Nature and Forest collaborate with scholars in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, The Science of The Total Environment, Biological Conservation, Journal of Ecology and Journal of Vegetation Science. Some of Research Institute for Nature and Forest's most productive authors include Martin Hermy, Olivier Honnay, Bart Muys, Hans Jacquemyn, Kris Verheyen, Cajo J. F. ter Braak, Rein Brys, Steve Juggins, Beatrijs Bossuyt and Dirk Maes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.