Institute for Biodiversity

118.2k citations
3.7k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institute for Biodiversity

3.2k papers receiving 113.3k citations

Peers

Institute for Biodiversity
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Ecological Modeling 7.1k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 26.3k
  • Ecology 29.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 14.0k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 7.4k
Replace University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice with:
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Czechia
Czech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre Czechia
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna Austria
Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences Netherlands
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Germany
Institute of Entomology Czechia
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech Belgium
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Germany
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation Germany
Agroscope Switzerland
Institute for Biodiversity relative to University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Czechia University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.4×
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Biodiversity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Biodiversity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Biodiversity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Biodiversity more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Biodiversity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Biodiversity at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Biodiversity at the time of their publication.

About Institute for Biodiversity

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Biodiversity have published 3.7k papers, which have received a total of 118.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 265 papers in Ecological Modeling, 1.1k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 545 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.0k papers in Ecology and 335 papers in Insect Science on the topics of Plant and animal studies (470 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (335 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (265 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (224 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (205 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (150 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (144 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (136 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (7.1k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (26.3k citations), Ecology (29.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (14.0k citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (7.4k citations). Authors at Institute for Biodiversity collaborate with scholars in Germany, Netherlands and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Scientific Reports, The Science of The Total Environment, PLoS ONE and Ecology and Evolution. Some of Institute for Biodiversity's most productive authors include Wilhelm Barthlott, Jef Huisman, Kerstin Koch, Kai Müller, Hans W. Paerl, Bharat Bhushan, Holger Kreft, Patrick G. Meirmans, Walter Jetz and Dietmar Quandt.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact