German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 751
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 1.4k
- Top scholars
- Nico EisenhauerHenrique M. PereiraFrançois BuscotHelge BruelheideNicole M. van DamJonathan M. ChaseAletta BonnJosef Settele
- Journals
- Ecology and Evolution (122 papers)PLoS ONE (92 papers)Scientific Reports (90 papers)Journal of Ecology (88 papers)Global Change Biology (75 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
4.0k papers receiving 145.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
- Ecological Modeling 18.4k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 39.8k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 35.5k
- Ecology 43.2k
- Global and Planetary Change 35.0k
Countries citing scholars working at German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research at the time of their publication.
About German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research have published 4.4k papers, which have received a total of 154.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 751 papers in Ecological Modeling, 1.5k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.2k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.2k papers in Ecology and 961 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.4k papers), Plant and animal studies (920 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (751 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (329 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (272 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (258 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (223 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (215 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (18.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (39.8k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (35.5k citations), Ecology (43.2k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (35.0k citations). Authors at German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Ecology and Evolution, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Journal of Ecology and Global Change Biology. Some of German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research's most productive authors include Nico Eisenhauer, Henrique M. Pereira, François Buscot, Helge Bruelheide, Nicole M. van Dam, Jonathan M. Chase, Aletta Bonn, Josef Settele, Tesfaye Wubet and Martin Mascher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.