Acta veterinaria Scandinavica

3.7k papers and 53.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.7k papers published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica in the last decades have received a total of 53.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica usually cover Small Animals (1.0k papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (879 papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (620 papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (413 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (353 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (349 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica are S.A. Henriksen, Joachim Pohlenz, Jørgen Steen Agerholm, David Fraser, S. Einarsson, Ν. F. Friis, Ragnhild Nielsen, Å. Lindholm, Trygve Grøndalen and H. Kindahl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta veterinaria Scandinavica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025