Rainforest Alliance

6.5k citations
286 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Rainforest Alliance

246 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Rainforest Alliance
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
  • Ecological Modeling 629
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.4k
  • Horticulture 96
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.1k
  • Developmental Biology 205
Replace National Wildlife Federation with:
National Wildlife Federation United States
International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) United States
African Wildlife Foundation United States
Northeast Climate Science Center United States
ForestGEO United States
The Wildlife Society United States
Mystic Seaport United States
World Wildlife Fund Canada Canada
Gulf of Maine Research Institute United States
Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Canada
Rainforest Alliance relative to National Wildlife Federation United States National Wildlife Federation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
National Wildlife Federation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Rainforest Alliance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Rainforest Alliance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Rainforest Alliance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rainforest Alliance more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Rainforest Alliance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Rainforest Alliance at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Rainforest Alliance at the time of their publication.

About Rainforest Alliance

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Rainforest Alliance have published 286 papers, which have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 19 papers in Developmental Biology, 35 papers in Ecological Modeling, 5 papers in Horticulture, 54 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 94 papers in Ecology on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (50 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (35 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (34 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (26 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (24 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (22 papers), Forest Management and Policy (19 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (629 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.4k citations), Horticulture (96 citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.1k citations) and Developmental Biology (205 citations). Authors at Rainforest Alliance collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Conservation Biology, Primates, Biotropica, Wildlife Research and Conservation Letters. Some of Rainforest Alliance's most productive authors include Eric Hirsch, Penny F. Langhammer, J. Peter Brosius, Charles Zerner, Anna Tsing, Deanna Newsom, Benjamin Cashore, T. R. Shankar Raman, R. A. Houghton and Alexander A. Nassikas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact