National Wildlife Federation
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Fire effects on ecosystems
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 35
- Ecology 156
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 72
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 36
- Avian ecology and behavior 25
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 20
- Top scholars
- Wendee HoltcampLowell PritchardFikret BerkesPo GardenLouis LebelOran R. YoungPer OlssonDavid W. Cash
- Journals
- Contraception (20 papers)Ecosphere (9 papers)Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (6 papers)Science (5 papers)Journal of Wildlife Management (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Wildlife Federation
305 papers receiving 13.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
- Ecological Modeling 1.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 4.5k
- Ecology 5.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.9k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1.2k
Countries citing scholars working at National Wildlife Federation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Wildlife Federation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Wildlife Federation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Wildlife Federation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Wildlife Federation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Wildlife Federation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Wildlife Federation at the time of their publication.
About National Wildlife Federation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Wildlife Federation have published 349 papers, which have received a total of 13.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 35 papers in Ecological Modeling, 156 papers in Ecology, 77 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 42 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 25 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (72 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (36 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (35 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (25 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (24 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (23 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (20 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (1.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (4.5k citations), Ecology (5.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.9k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.2k citations). Authors at National Wildlife Federation collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Contraception, Ecosphere, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Science and Journal of Wildlife Management. Some of National Wildlife Federation's most productive authors include Wendee Holtcamp, Lowell Pritchard, Fikret Berkes, Po Garden, Louis Lebel, Oran R. Young, Per Olsson, David W. Cash, W. Neil Adger and Piero Genovesi.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.