The Wildlife Society

10.1k citations
293 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Species Distribution and Climate Change 41
    • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 80
    • Avian ecology and behavior 31
    • Rangeland and Wildlife Management 23

The Wildlife Society

255 papers receiving 9.8k citations

Peers

The Wildlife Society
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • Ecological Modeling 2.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.5k
  • Ecology 5.0k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
Replace International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) with:
International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) United States
African Wildlife Foundation United States
National Wildlife Federation United States
Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission United States
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission United States
National Evolutionary Synthesis Center United States
ForestGEO United States
Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Canada
Rainforest Alliance United States
Birds Canada Canada
The Wildlife Society relative to International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) United States International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at The Wildlife Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at The Wildlife Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at The Wildlife Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Wildlife Society more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at The Wildlife Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with The Wildlife Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with The Wildlife Society at the time of their publication.

About The Wildlife Society

In recent decades, authors affiliated with The Wildlife Society have published 293 papers, which have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Ecological Modeling, 145 papers in Ecology, 59 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 25 papers in Small Animals and 19 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (80 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (41 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (31 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (23 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (20 papers), Plant and animal studies (19 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (2.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.5k citations), Ecology (5.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.2k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations). Authors at The Wildlife Society collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Journal of Wildlife Management, Biological Conservation, PLoS ONE and Conservation Biology. Some of The Wildlife Society's most productive authors include Abraham J. Miller‐Rushing, Byron K. Williams, Eleanor D. Brown, Jessica R. K. Forrest, Ilse Storch, Richard B. Primack, Jonathan M. Sleeman, Carolyn A. F. Enquist, David W. Inouye and Eric Post.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact