Northeast Climate Science Center

13.6k citations
291 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Northeast Climate Science Center

266 papers receiving 13.4k citations

Peers

Northeast Climate Science Center
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Ecological Modeling 2.0k
  • Global and Planetary Change 6.9k
  • Atmospheric Science 5.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.9k
  • Ecology 3.2k
Replace Ouranos with:
Ouranos Canada
Union of Concerned Scientists United States
Institute of the Environment United States
Applied GeoSolutions (United States) United States
National Wildlife Federation United States
Gulf of Maine Research Institute United States
ForestGEO United States
National Estuarine Research Reserve Association United States
Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve United States
International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) United States
Northeast Climate Science Center relative to Ouranos Canada Ouranos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Ouranos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Northeast Climate Science Center

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Northeast Climate Science Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Northeast Climate Science Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Northeast Climate Science Center more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Northeast Climate Science Center

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Northeast Climate Science Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Northeast Climate Science Center at the time of their publication.

About Northeast Climate Science Center

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Northeast Climate Science Center have published 291 papers, which have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 57 papers in Ecological Modeling, 163 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 112 papers in Atmospheric Science, 33 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 64 papers in Ecology on the topics of Climate variability and models (103 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (57 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (55 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (36 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (30 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (27 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (24 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (2.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (6.9k citations), Atmospheric Science (5.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.9k citations) and Ecology (3.2k citations). Authors at Northeast Climate Science Center collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Climatology, Journal of Climate, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society and Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Some of Northeast Climate Science Center's most productive authors include Arthur T. DeGaetano, Raymond S. Bradley, Mathias Vuille, Liang Ning, Toni Lyn Morelli, Rocío Urrutia‐Jalabert, Ambarish V. Karmalkar, James R. Miller, Robert J. Allen and Art Degaetano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact