ForestGEO

26.2k citations
326 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

ForestGEO

309 papers receiving 25.4k citations

Peers

ForestGEO
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 15.5k
  • Ecological Modeling 3.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 9.7k
  • Forestry 1.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 6.9k
Replace International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) with:
International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) United States
National Wildlife Federation United States
Virginia Institute of Marine Science United States
The Wildlife Society United States
Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center United States
Rainforest Alliance United States
Trout Unlimited United States
Bird Conservancy of the Rockies United States
Mystic Seaport United States
Espace pour la vie Canada
ForestGEO relative to International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) United States International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at ForestGEO

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at ForestGEO. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at ForestGEO with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ForestGEO more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at ForestGEO

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with ForestGEO at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with ForestGEO at the time of their publication.

About ForestGEO

In recent decades, authors affiliated with ForestGEO have published 326 papers, which have received a total of 26.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 208 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 57 papers in Ecological Modeling, 121 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 22 papers in Forestry and 100 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (172 papers), Forest ecology and management (99 papers), Plant and animal studies (75 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (57 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (54 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (28 papers), Forest Management and Policy (27 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (15.5k citations), Ecological Modeling (3.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (9.7k citations), Forestry (1.5k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (6.9k citations). Authors at ForestGEO collaborate with scholars in United States, Panama and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Ecology, New Phytologist, Ecology, PLoS ONE and Ecology Letters. Some of ForestGEO's most productive authors include Richard Condit, Stuart James Davies, Elizabeth C. Losos, Stephen P. Hubbell, Nathan G. Swenson, David E. Rothstein, David S. Wilcove, Robin B. Foster, David A. King and Sylvester Tan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact