Pacific Lutheran University

33.8k citations
1.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Pacific Lutheran University

1.3k papers receiving 30.5k citations

Peers

Pacific Lutheran University
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.8k
  • Marketing 2.3k
  • Computer Science Applications 1.4k
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 280
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.2k
Replace University of Washington Bothell with:
University of Washington Bothell United States
Willamette University United States
Thompson Rivers University Canada
Central Washington University United States
Institute for Learning Innovation United States
Gonzaga University United States
Royal Roads University Canada
City University of Seattle United States
Seattle Pacific University United States
Reed College United States
Pacific Lutheran University relative to University of Washington Bothell United States University of Washington Bothell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
University of Washington Bothell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Pacific Lutheran University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Pacific Lutheran University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Pacific Lutheran University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Lutheran University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Pacific Lutheran University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Pacific Lutheran University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Pacific Lutheran University at the time of their publication.

About Pacific Lutheran University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Pacific Lutheran University have published 1.5k papers, which have received a total of 33.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 51 papers in Computer Science Applications, 9 papers in Theoretical Computer Science, 81 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 8 papers in General Psychology and 123 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (48 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (40 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (33 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (24 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (22 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (20 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (20 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.8k citations), Marketing (2.3k citations), Computer Science Applications (1.4k citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (280 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.2k citations). Authors at Pacific Lutheran University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Chemical Physics, Teaching Theology & Religion, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Chemical Physics Letters and Journal of Baltic Studies. Some of Pacific Lutheran University's most productive authors include John A. Martilla, Kwong Tin Tang, John C. James, David E. McNabb, Paul T. Menzel, Laurie Murphy, R. Michael Brown, Stephanie Lea Brown, Christine Moon and William Paul Fifer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact