Pacific Lutheran University
Impact in
-
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Marketing top 5%
- Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Papers in
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming 40
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 20
- Top scholars
- John A. MartillaK. T. TangJohn C. JamesDavid E. McNabbPaul T. MenzelLaurie MurphyR. Michael BrownStephanie L. Brown
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical Physics (43 papers)Teaching Theology & Religion (15 papers)Linear Algebra and its Applications (12 papers)Chemical Physics Letters (10 papers)Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Pacific Lutheran University
1.3k papers receiving 30.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 2.9k
- Marketing 2.4k
- Computer Science Applications 1.4k
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 285
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Pacific Lutheran University
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Pacific Lutheran University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Pacific Lutheran University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pacific Lutheran University more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Pacific Lutheran University
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Pacific Lutheran University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Pacific Lutheran University at the time of their publication.
About Pacific Lutheran University
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Pacific Lutheran University have published 1.6k papers, which have received a total of 34.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 52 papers in Computer Science Applications, 80 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 124 papers in Social Psychology, 8 papers in General Psychology and 53 papers in Marketing on the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (47 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (40 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (33 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (25 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (22 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (20 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (20 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (19 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (2.9k citations), Marketing (2.4k citations), Computer Science Applications (1.4k citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (285 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.2k citations). Authors at Pacific Lutheran University collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Chemical Physics, Teaching Theology & Religion, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Chemical Physics Letters and Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. Some of Pacific Lutheran University's most productive authors include John A. Martilla, K. T. Tang, John C. James, David E. McNabb, Paul T. Menzel, Laurie Murphy, R. Michael Brown, Stephanie L. Brown, William P. Fifer and Christine Moon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.