University of Washington Bothell
Impact in
-
- Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Papers in
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming 76
- Top scholars
- Selina A. MohammedDavid R. WilliamsStanley F. SlaterDaniel A. JaffeFred RamsdellJohn C. NarverSandeep KrishnamurthyWayne Au
- Journals
- Environmental Science & Technology (28 papers)Atmospheric Environment (28 papers)Atmospheric chemistry and physics (26 papers)Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (26 papers)American Journal of Community Psychology (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
University of Washington Bothell
2.1k papers receiving 77.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 6.7k
- Atmospheric Science 8.0k
- Computer Science Applications 2.6k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 4.4k
- Immunology 7.4k
Countries citing scholars working at University of Washington Bothell
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Washington Bothell. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Washington Bothell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Washington Bothell more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Washington Bothell
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Washington Bothell at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Washington Bothell at the time of their publication.
About University of Washington Bothell
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Washington Bothell have published 2.4k papers, which have received a total of 82.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 115 papers in Computer Science Applications, 19 papers in Structural Biology, 115 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 155 papers in Atmospheric Science and 62 papers in Information Systems and Management on the topics of Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (132 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (85 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (76 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (70 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (50 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (49 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (41 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (38 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (6.7k citations), Atmospheric Science (8.0k citations), Computer Science Applications (2.6k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (4.4k citations) and Immunology (7.4k citations). Authors at University of Washington Bothell collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Science & Technology, Atmospheric Environment, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and American Journal of Community Psychology. Some of University of Washington Bothell's most productive authors include Selina A. Mohammed, David R. Williams, Stanley F. Slater, Daniel A. Jaffe, Fred Ramsdell, John C. Narver, Sandeep Krishnamurthy, Wayne Au, Kevin J. Laverty and Tom Cox.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.