Office of Technology Transfer
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 10%
-
- Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Papers in
-
- Intellectual Property and Patents 13
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences 11
- Top scholars
- Thomas B. ShopeJacquelyn OttmanEdwin R. StaffordCathy L. HartmanWillis R. FosterBenjamin T. BurtonShuhui LiTimothy A. Haskew
- Journals
- The Journal of Technology Transfer (9 papers)Nature Biotechnology (5 papers)Journal of Digital Imaging (4 papers)Circulation (3 papers)Hypertension (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Office of Technology Transfer
363 papers receiving 7.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 234
- Research and Theory 128
- Marketing 526
- Management of Technology and Innovation 398
- Business and International Management 75
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 36
Countries citing scholars working at Office of Technology Transfer
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office of Technology Transfer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office of Technology Transfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office of Technology Transfer more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Office of Technology Transfer
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office of Technology Transfer at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office of Technology Transfer at the time of their publication.
About Office of Technology Transfer
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office of Technology Transfer have published 461 papers, which have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 33 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 11 papers in Occupational Therapy, 13 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 12 papers in Information Systems and Management and 34 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Biotechnology and Related Fields (17 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (13 papers), Science, Research, and Medicine (13 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (12 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (11 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (11 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (10 papers) and Innovation Policy and R&D (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (128 citations), Marketing (526 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (398 citations), Business and International Management (75 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (36 citations). Authors at Office of Technology Transfer collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Technology Transfer, Nature Biotechnology, Journal of Digital Imaging, Circulation and Hypertension. Some of Office of Technology Transfer's most productive authors include Thomas B. Shope, Jacquelyn Ottman, Edwin R. Stafford, Cathy L. Hartman, Willis R. Foster, Benjamin T. Burton, Shuhui Li, Timothy A. Haskew, Richard P. Swatloski and Ashley J. Stevens.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.