New York Academy of Sciences

13.1k citations
507 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

New York Academy of Sciences

351 papers receiving 10.9k citations

Peers

New York Academy of Sciences
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
  • General Health Professions 1.8k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 1.0k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 200
  • Emergency Medical Services 355
Replace Providence Center with:
Providence Center United States
Health Decisions (United States) United States
Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas United States
Institute for Family Health United States
Cosmos Corporation (United States) United States
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute United States
Pathfinder International United States
Aetna (United States) United States
Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation United States
Project HOPE United States
New York Academy of Sciences relative to Providence Center United States Providence Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Providence Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at New York Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at New York Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at New York Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New York Academy of Sciences more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at New York Academy of Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with New York Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with New York Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication.

About New York Academy of Sciences

In recent decades, authors affiliated with New York Academy of Sciences have published 507 papers, which have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 63 papers in General Health Professions, 34 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 3 papers in General Psychology and 51 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Child Nutrition and Water Access (20 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (19 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (13 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (11 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (10 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), General Health Professions (1.8k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (1.0k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (200 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (355 citations). Authors at New York Academy of Sciences collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Physical Mesomechanics, American Journal of Public Health, Health Affairs and Journal of Urban Health. Some of New York Academy of Sciences's most productive authors include Christopher S. Hayter, Dennis P. Andrulis, Joseph A. Boscarino, Richard E. Adams, Filomena Gomes, Charles R. Figley, Sandro Galea, Zeno Stanga, Jennifer Stuber and Philipp Schüetz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact