Oak Ridge National Laboratory

3.5M citations
89.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

86.4k papers receiving 3.5M citations

Peers

Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Materials Chemistry 646.6k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 260.5k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 133.6k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 166.1k
  • Structural Biology 19.9k
Replace Argonne National Laboratory with:
Argonne National Laboratory United States
Georgia Institute of Technology United States
National Institute of Standards and Technology United States
United States Naval Research Laboratory United States
Brookhaven National Laboratory United States
Rice University United States
Clemson University United States
National Research Council Canada Canada
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute United States
United States Department of Energy United States
Oak Ridge National Laboratory relative to Argonne National Laboratory United States Argonne National Laboratory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Argonne National Laboratory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Oak Ridge National Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oak Ridge National Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Oak Ridge National Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory have published 89.5k papers, which have received a total of 3.5M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9.4k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 860 papers in Structural Biology, 4.6k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 15.7k papers in Materials Chemistry and 2.8k papers in Radiation on the topics of Nuclear physics research studies (4.7k papers), Fusion materials and technologies (3.6k papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (3.4k papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (1.9k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (1.8k papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (1.8k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1.7k papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (1.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Materials Chemistry (646.6k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (260.5k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (133.6k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (166.1k citations) and Structural Biology (19.9k citations). Authors at Oak Ridge National Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Physical Review C, Physical Review B and Journal of Applied Physics. Some of Oak Ridge National Laboratory's most productive authors include George M. Pharr, W. C. Oliver, Sheng Dai, E.P. George, Steven John Zinkle, G.R. Satchler, Georges A. Guiochon, David Joseph Singh, Chain Tsuan Liu and Sergei V. Kalinin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact