Argonne National Laboratory

3.0M citations
72.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Argonne National Laboratory

68.4k papers receiving 3.0M citations

Peers

Argonne National Laboratory
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Condensed Matter Physics 249.8k
  • Materials Chemistry 877.0k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 340.2k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 202.3k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 452.0k
Replace Oak Ridge National Laboratory with:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory United States
National Institute of Standards and Technology United States
United States Naval Research Laboratory United States
Ames National Laboratory United States
Brookhaven National Laboratory United States
Rice University United States
National Research Council Canada Canada
Illinois Institute of Technology United States
Missouri University of Science and Technology United States
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute United States
Argonne National Laboratory relative to Oak Ridge National Laboratory United States Oak Ridge National Laboratory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Argonne National Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Argonne National Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Argonne National Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Argonne National Laboratory more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Argonne National Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Argonne National Laboratory at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Argonne National Laboratory at the time of their publication.

About Argonne National Laboratory

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Argonne National Laboratory have published 72.1k papers, which have received a total of 3.0M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6.3k papers in Radiation, 7.9k papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 7.3k papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 731 papers in Structural Biology and 19.9k papers in Materials Chemistry on the topics of Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (3.9k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3.4k papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (3.3k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (3.2k papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (3.1k papers), Nuclear physics research studies (3.1k papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (2.6k papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (2.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Condensed Matter Physics (249.8k citations), Materials Chemistry (877.0k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (340.2k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (202.3k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (452.0k citations). Authors at Argonne National Laboratory collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physical Review B. Some of Argonne National Laboratory's most productive authors include Thom H. Dunning, Ian Foster, Khalil Amine, A. Rahman, Larry A. Curtiss, Stephen U. S. Choi, Jun Lü, Michele Parrinello, Ali Erdemir and Carl Kesselman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact