Northern Research Station

197.8k citations
5.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Northern Research Station

5.1k papers receiving 192.6k citations

Peers

Northern Research Station
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 49.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 84.9k
  • Ecology 71.1k
  • Ecological Modeling 11.8k
  • Insect Science 28.6k
Replace Minnesota Department of Natural Resources with:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources United States
Illinois Archaeological Survey United States
Illinois Department of Natural Resources United States
Michigan Department of Natural Resources United States
Southern Research Station United States
Missouri Botanical Garden United States
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources United States
The Nature Conservancy United States
NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory United States
Northern Research Station relative to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources United States Minnesota Department of Natural Resources's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Northern Research Station

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Northern Research Station. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Northern Research Station with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Northern Research Station more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Northern Research Station

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Northern Research Station at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Northern Research Station at the time of their publication.

About Northern Research Station

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Northern Research Station have published 5.4k papers, which have received a total of 197.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.7k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 2.4k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 1.0k papers in Insect Science, 2.1k papers in Ecology and 308 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Fire effects on ecosystems (1.1k papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (820 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (780 papers), Forest ecology and management (775 papers), Forest Management and Policy (683 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (591 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (508 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (335 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (49.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (84.9k citations), Ecology (71.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (11.8k citations) and Insect Science (28.6k citations). Authors at Northern Research Station collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research, Forests and Journal of Forestry. Some of Northern Research Station's most productive authors include Andrew M. Liebhold, Ronald E. McRoberts, David J. Nowak, Christopher W. Woodall, David Y. Hollinger, Brian J. Palik, J. Morgan Grove, Andrew D. Richardson, Anthony W. D’Amato and Randall K. Kolka.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact