Canadian Forest Service

288.9k citations
7.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Forest ecology and management 747
    • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 320
    • Seedling growth and survival studies 303
    • Forest Insect Ecology and Management 1.3k

Canadian Forest Service

7.6k papers receiving 288.9k citations

Peers

Canadian Forest Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Global and Planetary Change 84.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 38.4k
  • Ecology 61.3k
  • Insect Science 21.9k
  • Ecological Modeling 5.2k
Replace Natural Resources Canada with:
Natural Resources Canada Canada
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States
Environment and Climate Change Canada Canada
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies United States
The Nature Conservancy United States
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution United States
National Park Service United States
Beltsville Agricultural Research Center United States
US Forest Service United States
Canadian Forest Service relative to Natural Resources Canada Canada Natural Resources Canada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natural Resources Canada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Canadian Forest Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Canadian Forest Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Canadian Forest Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian Forest Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Canadian Forest Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Canadian Forest Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Canadian Forest Service at the time of their publication.

About Canadian Forest Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Canadian Forest Service have published 7.8k papers, which have received a total of 288.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.2k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 2k papers in Ecology, 912 papers in Insect Science, 1.7k papers in Global and Planetary Change and 104 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Forest Insect Ecology and Management (1.3k papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (855 papers), Forest ecology and management (747 papers), Forest Management and Policy (563 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (387 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (331 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (320 papers) and Seedling growth and survival studies (303 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (84.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (38.4k citations), Ecology (61.3k citations), Insect Science (21.9k citations) and Ecological Modeling (5.2k citations). Authors at Canadian Forest Service collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including The Forestry Chronicle, Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forests and Remote Sensing of Environment. Some of Canadian Forest Service's most productive authors include Michael A. Wulder, Mike Flannigan, Joanne White, Nicholas C. Coops, Werner A. Kurz, Yves Bergeron, B. Mike Wotton, Jacques Régnière, B. J. Stocks and Tomoo Royama.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact