Natural Resources Canada

410.5k citations
13.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Natural Resources Canada

12.5k papers receiving 402.3k citations

Peers

Natural Resources Canada
Comparison fields: 5 of 241
  • Global and Planetary Change 106.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 52.1k
  • Ecology 90.5k
  • Atmospheric Science 56.4k
  • Environmental Engineering 45.0k
Replace Environment and Climate Change Canada with:
Environment and Climate Change Canada Canada
Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canada
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States
Environmental Protection Agency United States
United States Department of Agriculture United States
Woodwell Climate Research Center United States
Canadian Forest Service Canada
US Forest Service United States
Marine Biological Laboratory United States
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory United States
Natural Resources Canada relative to Environment and Climate Change Canada Canada Environment and Climate Change Canada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Environment and Climate Change Canada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Natural Resources Canada

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Natural Resources Canada. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Natural Resources Canada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Resources Canada more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Natural Resources Canada

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Natural Resources Canada at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Natural Resources Canada at the time of their publication.

About Natural Resources Canada

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Natural Resources Canada have published 13.2k papers, which have received a total of 410.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.7k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 2.9k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 1.6k papers in Insect Science, 2.6k papers in Ecology and 1.8k papers in Atmospheric Science on the topics of Fire effects on ecosystems (1.4k papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (1.1k papers), Forest ecology and management (959 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (745 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (732 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (665 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (632 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (612 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (106.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (52.1k citations), Ecology (90.5k citations), Atmospheric Science (56.4k citations) and Environmental Engineering (45.0k citations). Authors at Natural Resources Canada collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, The Forestry Chronicle, Remote Sensing of Environment and Forests. Some of Natural Resources Canada's most productive authors include Michael A. Wulder, Edward J. Anthony, Joanne C. White, Nicholas C. Coops, Caroline M. Preston, Mike Flannigan, Frank Czerwiński, Werner A. Kurz, J. E. Dutrizac and J. Kouba.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact