Southern Research Station

159.4k citations
5.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Southern Research Station

4.8k papers receiving 155.2k citations

Peers

Southern Research Station
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 38.6k
  • Global and Planetary Change 57.1k
  • Insect Science 26.3k
  • Ecology 50.6k
  • Ecological Modeling 6.0k
Replace The Nature Conservancy with:
The Nature Conservancy United States
Savannah River National Laboratory United States
Illinois Archaeological Survey United States
National Park Service United States
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center United States
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science United States
United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States
Illinois Department of Natural Resources United States
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry United States
Sewanee: The University of the South United States
Southern Research Station relative to The Nature Conservancy United States The Nature Conservancy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
The Nature Conservancy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Southern Research Station

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Southern Research Station. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Southern Research Station with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Southern Research Station more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Southern Research Station

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Southern Research Station at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Southern Research Station at the time of their publication.

About Southern Research Station

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Southern Research Station have published 5.1k papers, which have received a total of 159.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.1k papers in Insect Science, 1.8k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 1.7k papers in Ecology and 199 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Fire effects on ecosystems (745 papers), Forest ecology and management (705 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (703 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (609 papers), Forest Management and Policy (503 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (476 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (397 papers) and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (376 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (38.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (57.1k citations), Insect Science (26.3k citations), Ecology (50.6k citations) and Ecological Modeling (6.0k citations). Authors at Southern Research Station collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science, Journal of Forestry, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry and Journal of Economic Entomology. Some of Southern Research Station's most productive authors include A. D. Wilson, A. Dennis Lemly, Ge Sun, Michael D. Ulyshen, Steven G. McNulty, Kurt H. Riitters, James M. Vose, Thomas Elder, Viniece Jennings and Cathryn H. Greenberg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact