Universidade Nova de Lisboa

992.7k citations
41.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Universidade Nova de Lisboa

35.9k papers receiving 936.7k citations

Peers

Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Catalysis 42.0k
  • Filtration and Separation 10.1k
  • Pollution 38.9k
  • Marketing 30.2k
  • Information Systems and Management 21.8k
Replace University of Lisbon with:
University of Lisbon Portugal
Universidade do Porto Portugal
Universidad de Sevilla Spain
University of Aveiro Portugal
University of Coimbra Portugal
University of Minho Portugal
Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela Spain
Universidade de Vigo Spain
Universidad de Granada Spain
Universidade Nova de Lisboa relative to University of Lisbon Portugal University of Lisbon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
University of Lisbon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidade Nova de Lisboa. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidade Nova de Lisboa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidade Nova de Lisboa more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidade Nova de Lisboa at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidade Nova de Lisboa at the time of their publication.

About Universidade Nova de Lisboa

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidade Nova de Lisboa have published 41.1k papers, which have received a total of 992.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 396 papers in Conservation, 786 papers in Catalysis, 182 papers in Filtration and Separation, 604 papers in Earth-Surface Processes and 788 papers in Management Information Systems on the topics of Ionic liquids properties and applications (682 papers), Building materials and conservation (474 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (452 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (445 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (441 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (420 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (377 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (352 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Catalysis (42.0k citations), Filtration and Separation (10.1k citations), Pollution (38.9k citations), Marketing (30.2k citations) and Information Systems and Management (21.8k citations). Authors at Universidade Nova de Lisboa collaborate with scholars in Portugal, United States and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Molecules and Sustainability. Some of Universidade Nova de Lisboa's most productive authors include Jörg Henseler, Christian M. Ringle, Marko Sarstedt, Tiago Oliveira, Elvira Fortunato, Rodrigo Martins, Luís M. Camarinha-Matos, Kenneth R. Seddon, Maria A.M. Reis and Luís Paulo N. Rebelo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact