Universidad de Granada

65.5k papers receiving 1.6M citations

Peers

Universidad de Granada
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Management Science and Operations Research 70.1k
  • Biochemistry 28.8k
  • Geophysics 66.4k
  • Earth-Surface Processes 32.0k
  • Artificial Intelligence 149.2k
Replace Universidad Complutense de Madrid with:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain
University of Lisbon Portugal
Universitat de València Spain
Universitat de Barcelona Spain
Universidad de Sevilla Spain
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier France
Universidad de Zaragoza Spain
University of Coimbra Portugal
University of the Basque Country Spain
Universidade do Porto Portugal
Universidad de Granada relative to Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain Universidad Complutense de Madrid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Universidad de Granada

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad de Granada. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad de Granada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad de Granada more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad de Granada

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad de Granada at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad de Granada at the time of their publication.

About Universidad de Granada

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad de Granada have published 74.7k papers, which have received a total of 1.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 369 papers in Life-span and Life-course Studies, 1.4k papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 2.5k papers in Geophysics, 1.5k papers in Statistics and Probability and 1.9k papers in Archeology on the topics of Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide (1.2k papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.2k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.2k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.2k papers), Sports Performance and Training (1.0k papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (1.0k papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (782 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (767 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management Science and Operations Research (70.1k citations), Biochemistry (28.8k citations), Geophysics (66.4k citations), Earth-Surface Processes (32.0k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (149.2k citations). Authors at Universidad de Granada collaborate with scholars in Spain, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PLoS ONE, Nutrients, Scientific Reports and Sustainability. Some of Universidad de Granada's most productive authors include Francisco Herrera, Enrique Herrera‐Viedma, Salvador García, Luis Martı́nez, Ángel Gil, Carlos Moreno‐Castilla, Antonio Segura‐Carretero, Francisco B. Ortega, Francisco Chiclana and Jonatan R. Ruiz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact