National Forest Centre

9.5k citations
531 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Forest Centre

489 papers receiving 9.3k citations

Peers

National Forest Centre
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.6k
  • Global and Planetary Change 4.3k
  • Insect Science 1.7k
  • Atmospheric Science 1.6k
  • Ecology 2.3k
Replace Forest Research Institute with:
Forest Research Institute Hungary
Institute of Landscape Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences Slovakia
Landscape Research Institute Czechia
Croatian Forest Research Institute Croatia
Wasser Cluster Lunz Austria
Forestry and Game Management Research Institute Czechia
Forest Research Institute Bulgaria
Slovenian Forestry Institute Slovenia
Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts Slovenia
National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry "Marin Drăcea" Romania
National Forest Centre relative to Forest Research Institute Hungary Forest Research Institute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Forest Research Institute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Forest Centre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Forest Centre. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Forest Centre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Forest Centre more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Forest Centre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Forest Centre at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Forest Centre at the time of their publication.

About National Forest Centre

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Forest Centre have published 531 papers, which have received a total of 9.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 234 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 228 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 121 papers in Insect Science, 112 papers in Ecology and 77 papers in Atmospheric Science on the topics of Forest ecology and management (202 papers), Forest Management and Policy (121 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (89 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (73 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (68 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (62 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (61 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (53 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (4.3k citations), Insect Science (1.7k citations), Atmospheric Science (1.6k citations) and Ecology (2.3k citations). Authors at National Forest Centre collaborate with scholars in Slovakia, Czechia and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Forest Ecology and Management, European Journal of Forest Research, Forest Policy and Economics and Environmental Pollution. Some of National Forest Centre's most productive authors include Bohdan Konôpka, Tomáš Hlásny, Michal Bošeľa, Igor Štefančík, Jozef Pajtík, Dušan Gömöry, Tomáš Bucha, Vladimír Šebeň, Rastislav Raši and Roman Longauer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact