Forestry and Game Management Research Institute
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Insect Science top 10%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Insect and Pesticide Research
Papers in
-
- Forest ecology and management 162
- Insect Science 163
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 96
- Insect and Pesticide Research 53
- Top scholars
- Vladimír ChalupaStanislav VacekJaroslav HolušaJan CukorMilos KnížekZdeněk VacekM. SlodičákVít Šrámek
- Journals
- Forests (36 papers)Forest Ecology and Management (18 papers)Journal of Forest Science (159 papers)Zootaxa (17 papers)Biologia Plantarum (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaSlovakiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Forestry and Game Management Research Institute
573 papers receiving 6.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.0k
- Insect Science 1.5k
- Ecology 1.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Forestry and Game Management Research Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Forestry and Game Management Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Forestry and Game Management Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forestry and Game Management Research Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Forestry and Game Management Research Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Forestry and Game Management Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Forestry and Game Management Research Institute at the time of their publication.
About Forestry and Game Management Research Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Forestry and Game Management Research Institute have published 654 papers, which have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 198 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 163 papers in Insect Science, 211 papers in Ecology, 153 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 198 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Forest ecology and management (162 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (129 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (100 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (96 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (53 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (52 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (51 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (47 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.0k citations), Insect Science (1.5k citations), Ecology (1.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations). Authors at Forestry and Game Management Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Czechia, Slovakia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Forests, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Forest Science, Zootaxa and Biologia Plantarum. Some of Forestry and Game Management Research Institute's most productive authors include Vladimír Chalupa, Stanislav Vacek, Jaroslav Holuša, Jan Cukor, Milos Knížek, Zdeněk Vacek, M. Slodičák, Vít Šrámek, Jana Malá and Rostislav Linda.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.