Landscape Research Institute

10.8k citations
565 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Landscape Research Institute

539 papers receiving 10.8k citations

Peers

Landscape Research Institute
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.2k
  • Insect Science 1.3k
  • Soil Science 1.1k
  • Environmental Engineering 858
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
Replace Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development with:
Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development Germany
Forestry and Game Management Research Institute Czechia
Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz Germany
Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Germany
Slovenian Forestry Institute Slovenia
Austrian Research Centre for Forests Austria
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Czechia
Croatian Forest Research Institute Croatia
Environment Agency Austria Austria
National Forest Centre Slovakia
Landscape Research Institute relative to Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development Germany Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Landscape Research Institute

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Landscape Research Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Landscape Research Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Landscape Research Institute more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Landscape Research Institute

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Landscape Research Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Landscape Research Institute at the time of their publication.

About Landscape Research Institute

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Landscape Research Institute have published 565 papers, which have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 99 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 55 papers in Insect Science, 66 papers in Soil Science, 67 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 33 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (59 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (52 papers), Forest ecology and management (40 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (34 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (31 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (30 papers), Soil and Environmental Studies (29 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.2k citations), Insect Science (1.3k citations), Soil Science (1.1k citations), Environmental Engineering (858 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations). Authors at Landscape Research Institute collaborate with scholars in Czechia, United States and Poland and have published in prestigious journals including Forest Ecology and Management, The Science of The Total Environment, European Journal of Forest Research, Forest Pathology and Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Some of Landscape Research Institute's most productive authors include Pavel Šamonil, Tomáš Vrška, Kamil Král, Ivan Suchara, Julie Sucharová, Dušan Adam, David Janík, Libor Hort, Jakub Horák and Łukasz Pawlik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact