Tomáš Bucha

36 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Tomáš Bucha
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 213
  • Environmental Engineering 232
  • Global and Planetary Change 233
  • Insect Science 132
  • Ecology 227
Replace Paweł Hawryło with:
Paweł Hawryło Poland
Doo-Ahn Kwak South Korea
Masato Katoh Japan
Anthony G. Vorster United States
Olivier R. van Lier Canada
Cici Alexander United Kingdom
Matthias Dees Germany
Yasumasa Hirata Japan
Ivan Balenović Croatia
Paul Magdon Germany
Tomáš Bucha relative to Paweł Hawryło Poland Paweł Hawryło's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Paweł Hawryło · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomáš Bucha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomáš Bucha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomáš Bucha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomáš Bucha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomáš Bucha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomáš Bucha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomáš Bucha. The network helps show where Tomáš Bucha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomáš Bucha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomáš Bucha Line = papers co-authored together Tomáš Bucha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201766
2 201944
3 201743
4 201541
5 200832
6 201527
7 201723
8 201722
9 201922
10 201620
11 201420
12 201920
13 200720
14 201819
15 202117
16 201917
17 201915
18 202012
19 202110
20 201710

About Tomáš Bucha

Tomáš Bucha is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Insect Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (20 papers), Forest ecology and management (17 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (16 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (12 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (7 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (5 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (213 citations), Environmental Engineering (232 citations), Global and Planetary Change (233 citations), Insect Science (132 citations) and Ecology (227 citations). Tomáš Bucha has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Milan Koreň, Ivan Barka, Martin Mokroš, Tomáš Hlásny, Hans‐Jürgen Stibig, Ladislav Kulla, Rastislav Jakuš, Ján Ferenčík, Jiří Trombik and Miloš Gejdoš. Their work appears in journals such as Forests, Remote Sensing, Applied Sciences, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation and International Journal of Remote Sensing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact