National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
Impact in
- Paleontology top 5%
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
- Paleontology 77
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 63
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 25
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 24
- Top scholars
- Adam Eyre‐WalkerJoe HerefordLiam J. RevellStephen A. SmithHeather PiwowarPeter D. KeightleyCraig R. McClainBrian L. Sidlauskas
- Journals
- Evolution (17 papers)PLoS ONE (16 papers)Systematic Biology (14 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (14 papers)Molecular Biology and Evolution (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
357 papers receiving 33.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
- Paleontology 5.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 5.8k
- Ecological Modeling 781
- Developmental Biology 610
Countries citing scholars working at National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Evolutionary Synthesis Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Evolutionary Synthesis Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Evolutionary Synthesis Center more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Evolutionary Synthesis Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Evolutionary Synthesis Center at the time of their publication.
About National Evolutionary Synthesis Center
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Evolutionary Synthesis Center have published 359 papers, which have received a total of 33.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 77 papers in Paleontology, 69 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 7 papers in Developmental Biology, 5 papers in Ecological Modeling and 20 papers in Geometry and Topology on the topics of Evolution and Paleontology Studies (63 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (46 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (25 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (24 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (24 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (23 papers), Research Data Management Practices (23 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (23 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Paleontology (5.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (5.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (781 citations) and Developmental Biology (610 citations). Authors at National Evolutionary Synthesis Center collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Evolution, PLoS ONE, Systematic Biology, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Molecular Biology and Evolution. Some of National Evolutionary Synthesis Center's most productive authors include Adam Eyre‐Walker, Joe Hereford, Liam J. Revell, Stephen A. Smith, Heather Piwowar, Peter D. Keightley, Craig R. McClain, Brian L. Sidlauskas, Clinton D. Francis and Robert Lanfear.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.