National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 43
-
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 60
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 28
- Top scholars
- Margaret A. PalmerPaolo D’OdoricoChristopher H. TrisosAlbert RuhíMaria Cristina RulliKelly L. HondulaSafa MotesharreiJampel Dell’Angelo
- Journals
- Environmental Research Letters (18 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (14 papers)Ecosphere (11 papers)Science (10 papers)Nature Sustainability (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
437 papers receiving 25.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
- Ecological Modeling 2.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 9.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.3k
- Ecology 7.8k
- Water Science and Technology 3.5k
Countries citing scholars working at National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center at the time of their publication.
About National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center have published 450 papers, which have received a total of 27.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 43 papers in Ecological Modeling, 166 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 82 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 155 papers in Ecology and 62 papers in Water Science and Technology on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (62 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (60 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (43 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (40 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (29 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (29 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (28 papers) and Plant and animal studies (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (2.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (9.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.3k citations), Ecology (7.8k citations) and Water Science and Technology (3.5k citations). Authors at National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Research Letters, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Ecosphere, Science and Nature Sustainability. Some of National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center's most productive authors include Margaret A. Palmer, Paolo D’Odorico, Christopher H. Trisos, Albert Ruhí, Maria Cristina Rulli, Kelly L. Hondula, Safa Motesharrei, Jampel Dell’Angelo, Alex L. Pigot and Colin J. Carlson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.