Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 130
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 23
- Top scholars
- Dominique GravelTimothée PoisotMonique PoulinAndrew GonzalezFrançois VézinaDaniel B. StoufferJérôme ThéauNicolas Mouquet
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (12 papers)Global Ecology and Biogeography (10 papers)Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (10 papers)Ecography (9 papers)Ecology and Evolution (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec
364 papers receiving 11.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.2k
- Ecological Modeling 605
- Ecology 3.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.6k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
Countries citing scholars working at Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec at the time of their publication.
About Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec have published 387 papers, which have received a total of 11.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 137 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 23 papers in Ecological Modeling, 136 papers in Ecology, 45 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 51 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (130 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (33 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (30 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (23 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (19 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (17 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (605 citations), Ecology (3.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.6k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations). Authors at Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and France and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Ecography and Ecology and Evolution. Some of Centre de la science de la biodiversité du Québec's most productive authors include Dominique Gravel, Timothée Poisot, Monique Poulin, Andrew Gonzalez, François Vézina, Daniel B. Stouffer, Jérôme Théau, Nicolas Mouquet, David Mouillot and Jérôme Cimon-Morin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.