McMaster University

5.1M citations
125.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

McMaster University

108.6k papers receiving 4.3M citations

Peers

McMaster University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Internal Medicine 125.9k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 317.9k
  • Gastroenterology 67.3k
  • Family Practice 21.1k
  • Physiology 287.2k
Replace University of Toronto with:
University of Toronto Canada
University of Michigan United States
Cornell University United States
University of Pittsburgh United States
University of Ottawa Canada
University of Pennsylvania United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
Johns Hopkins Medicine United States
Case Western Reserve University United States
Western University Canada
McMaster University relative to University of Toronto Canada University of Toronto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
University of Toronto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at McMaster University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at McMaster University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at McMaster University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites McMaster University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at McMaster University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with McMaster University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with McMaster University at the time of their publication.

About McMaster University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with McMaster University have published 125.8k papers, which have received a total of 5.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.1k papers in Internal Medicine, 512 papers in Family Practice, 2.1k papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 5.6k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 2.7k papers in Hematology on the topics of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2.1k papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1.7k papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1.7k papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (1.5k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1.0k papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1.0k papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (982 papers) and Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (977 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Internal Medicine (125.9k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (317.9k citations), Gastroenterology (67.3k citations), Family Practice (21.1k citations) and Physiology (287.2k citations). Authors at McMaster University collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Blood and Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Some of McMaster University's most productive authors include Gordon Henry Guyatt, S. Haykin, Richard F. W. Bader, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker, Douglas M. Bates, Steve Walker, Chris M. Wood, Gerard D. Wright and Geoffrey R. Norman.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact