Los Angeles Police Department

5.6k citations
259 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Los Angeles Police Department

239 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

Los Angeles Police Department
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 148
  • Clinical Psychology 507
  • Political Science and International Relations 774
  • Health 190
  • Paleontology 195
Replace Kingston University with:
Kingston University United States
Nevada State University United States
Utah Tech University United States
Ibis Reproductive Health United States
Lewis Clark State College United States
Los Angeles Unified School District United States
Oregon State University Cascades United States
Saint Martin's University United States
Creative Commons United States
Adams State University United States
Los Angeles Police Department relative to Kingston University United States Kingston University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×49.3×
Kingston University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Los Angeles Police Department

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Los Angeles Police Department. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Los Angeles Police Department with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Los Angeles Police Department more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Los Angeles Police Department

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Los Angeles Police Department at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Los Angeles Police Department at the time of their publication.

About Los Angeles Police Department

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Los Angeles Police Department have published 259 papers, which have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 35 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 21 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Toxicology, 4 papers in Applied Psychology and 16 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Policing Practices and Perceptions (31 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (9 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (6 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (148 citations), Clinical Psychology (507 citations), Political Science and International Relations (774 citations), Health (190 citations) and Paleontology (195 citations). Authors at Los Angeles Police Department collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Spain and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, Policing An International Journal and American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis. Some of Los Angeles Police Department's most productive authors include DAVID A. KLINGER, John Cook Lane, William M. Reynolds, Kevin D. Stark, Nadine J. Kaslow, Kris Mohandie, KK Sharma, Martin P. Reiser, J. Reid Meloy and Tonia Poteat.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact