Creative Commons

90.3k citations
13.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

    • Dental Radiography and Imaging 185
    • Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments 168
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 169
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 165

Creative Commons

9.4k papers receiving 72.3k citations

Peers

Creative Commons
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
  • Orthodontics 1.9k
  • Oral Surgery 2.9k
  • Periodontics 1.9k
  • Health Informatics 551
  • Surgery 13.5k
Replace Kaiser Permanente with:
Kaiser Permanente United States
S.P.E.C.I.E.S. United States
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research United States
Statistical Research (United States) United States
Stanford Health Care United States
University of Portland United States
Exponent (United States) United States
Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center United States
Twitter (United States) United States
University of Washington Tacoma United States
Creative Commons relative to Kaiser Permanente United States Kaiser Permanente's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Kaiser Permanente · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Creative Commons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Creative Commons. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Creative Commons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creative Commons more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Creative Commons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Creative Commons at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Creative Commons at the time of their publication.

About Creative Commons

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Creative Commons have published 13.5k papers, which have received a total of 90.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 554 papers in Oral Surgery, 607 papers in Ophthalmology, 2.9k papers in Surgery, 316 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 268 papers in Periodontics on the topics of Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (474 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (255 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (218 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (212 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (185 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (169 papers), Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (168 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (165 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthodontics (1.9k citations), Oral Surgery (2.9k citations), Periodontics (1.9k citations), Health Informatics (551 citations) and Surgery (13.5k citations). Authors at Creative Commons collaborate with scholars in United States, India and China and have published in prestigious journals including Medicine, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology and Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. Some of Creative Commons's most productive authors include Michio Inagaki, Ying Yang, Feiyu Kang, Paul De Grauwe, Lola Rahib, Mackenzie R. Wehner, Kevin T. Nead, Lynn M. Matrisian, Carola Schenone and Eric Swanson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact