Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
Impact in
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Communication top 10%
- Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Wikis in Education and Collaboration
Papers in
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 26
- Top scholars
- Peter GerjetsUlrike CreßKatharina ScheiterRita TriebskornFriedrich W. HesseJoachim KimmerleHeinz‐R. KöhlerFrank Fischer
- Journals
- Zootaxa (27 papers)Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (21 papers)Learning and Instruction (10 papers)Computers in Human Behavior (9 papers)Intereconomics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
475 papers receiving 11.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 233
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 2.6k
- Communication 870
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.5k
- Computer Science Applications 653
Countries citing scholars working at Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung at the time of their publication.
About Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung have published 639 papers, which have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 6 papers in General Decision Sciences, 36 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 34 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 65 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 28 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology on the topics of Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (33 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (26 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (26 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Online and Blended Learning (13 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (11 papers) and Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (11 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.6k citations), Communication (870 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.5k citations) and Computer Science Applications (653 citations). Authors at Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Zootaxa, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Learning and Instruction, Computers in Human Behavior and Intereconomics. Some of Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung's most productive authors include Peter Gerjets, Ulrike Creß, Katharina Scheiter, Rita Triebskorn, Friedrich W. Hesse, Joachim Kimmerle, Heinz‐R. Köhler, Frank Fischer, Richard Catrambone and Ingo Kollar.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.