IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.5%
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Firm Innovation and Growth
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Papers in
-
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 1.2k
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 450
- Firm Innovation and Growth 355
- Top scholars
- Marco CaliendoArmin FalkJoshua D. AngristEdward P. LazearSherwin RosenMiles CorakMarco VivarelliGuido W. Imbens
- Journals
- Labour Economics (151 papers)Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (131 papers)Journal of Population Economics (130 papers)Economics Letters (99 papers)European Economic Review (90 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
5.3k papers receiving 150.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
- General Decision Sciences 4.4k
- Economics and Econometrics 63.2k
- Safety Research 19.0k
- Gender Studies 15.8k
- Demography 17.3k
Countries citing scholars working at IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at IZA - Institute of Labor Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at IZA - Institute of Labor Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IZA - Institute of Labor Economics more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with IZA - Institute of Labor Economics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with IZA - Institute of Labor Economics at the time of their publication.
About IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
In recent decades, authors affiliated with IZA - Institute of Labor Economics have published 5.9k papers, which have received a total of 159.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.0k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 185 papers in General Decision Sciences, 851 papers in Gender Studies, 669 papers in Safety Research and 801 papers in Demography on the topics of Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (1.2k papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (747 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (670 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (592 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (450 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (387 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (355 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (353 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (4.4k citations), Economics and Econometrics (63.2k citations), Safety Research (19.0k citations), Gender Studies (15.8k citations) and Demography (17.3k citations). Authors at IZA - Institute of Labor Economics collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Labour Economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Journal of Population Economics, Economics Letters and European Economic Review. Some of IZA - Institute of Labor Economics's most productive authors include Marco Caliendo, Armin Falk, Joshua D. Angrist, Edward P. Lazear, Sherwin Rosen, Miles Corak, Marco Vivarelli, Guido W. Imbens, Klaus F. Zimmermann and Alan B. Krueger.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.