London Business School
Impact in
- Accounting top 0.1%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Strategy and Management top 0.1%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Papers in
- Finance 1.4k
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 679
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 413
- Accounting 1.3k
- Corporate Finance and Governance 880
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 356
- Top scholars
- Sumantra GhoshalGary HamelJulian BirkinshawJanine NahapietPaul A. GeroskiChris VossJohn ChildLakshmanan Shivakumar
- Journals
- Management Science (99 papers)Strategic Management Journal (94 papers)Journal of Financial Economics (80 papers)Review of Financial Studies (78 papers)Organization Science (69 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
London Business School
5.2k papers receiving 367.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 247
- Accounting 98.8k
- Strategy and Management 130.2k
- Finance 77.4k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 56.7k
- Marketing 45.1k
Countries citing scholars working at London Business School
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at London Business School. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at London Business School with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites London Business School more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at London Business School
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with London Business School at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with London Business School at the time of their publication.
About London Business School
In recent decades, authors affiliated with London Business School have published 6.1k papers, which have received a total of 397.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.4k papers in Finance, 1.3k papers in Accounting, 616 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 1.1k papers in Strategy and Management and 125 papers in General Decision Sciences on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (880 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (679 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (455 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (413 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (371 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (356 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (279 papers) and Economic theories and models (268 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Accounting (98.8k citations), Strategy and Management (130.2k citations), Finance (77.4k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (56.7k citations) and Marketing (45.1k citations). Authors at London Business School collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Management Science, Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Financial Economics, Review of Financial Studies and Organization Science. Some of London Business School's most productive authors include Sumantra Ghoshal, Gary Hamel, Julian Birkinshaw, Janine Nahapiet, Paul A. Geroski, Chris Voss, John Child, Lakshmanan Shivakumar, C. K. Prahalad and Ioannis Ioannou.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.