Copenhagen Business School

393.2k citations
13.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Copenhagen Business School

12.1k papers receiving 393k citations

Peers

Copenhagen Business School
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Strategy and Management 103k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 36.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 43.8k
  • Marketing 25.5k
  • Management Information Systems 25.5k
Replace Stockholm School of Economics with:
Stockholm School of Economics Sweden
Tilburg University Netherlands
University of St.Gallen Switzerland
Vienna University of Economics and Business Austria
BI Norwegian Business School Norway
University of Mannheim Germany
Jönköping University Sweden
Bocconi University Italy
Leuphana University of Lüneburg Germany
INSEAD France
Copenhagen Business School relative to Stockholm School of Economics Sweden Stockholm School of Economics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Stockholm School of Economics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Copenhagen Business School

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Copenhagen Business School. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Copenhagen Business School with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Copenhagen Business School more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Copenhagen Business School

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Copenhagen Business School at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Copenhagen Business School at the time of their publication.

About Copenhagen Business School

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Copenhagen Business School have published 13.2k papers, which have received a total of 393.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.6k papers in Strategy and Management, 1.6k papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 801 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 812 papers in Management Information Systems and 646 papers in Marketing on the topics of Management and Organizational Studies (932 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (612 papers), International Business and FDI (558 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (362 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (339 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (333 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (312 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (233 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Strategy and Management (103k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (36.1k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (43.8k citations), Marketing (25.5k citations) and Management Information Systems (25.5k citations). Authors at Copenhagen Business School collaborate with scholars in Denmark, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Organization Studies, Research Policy, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of International Business Studies. Some of Copenhagen Business School's most productive authors include Nicolai J. Foss, Keld Laursen, Majken Schultz, Ammon J. Salter, Torben Pedersen, Peter Maskell, Jan Mouritsen, Klaus E. Meyer, Lasse Heje Pedersen and Anders Malmberg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact