Copenhagen Business School

443.3k citations
16.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Copenhagen Business School

13.1k papers receiving 407.3k citations

Peers

Copenhagen Business School
Comparison fields: 5 of 249
  • Strategy and Management 131.7k
  • Business and International Management 13.5k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 44.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 57.9k
  • Marketing 47.2k
Replace Stockholm School of Economics with:
Stockholm School of Economics Sweden
Tilburg University Netherlands
Maastricht University Netherlands
Erasmus University Rotterdam Netherlands
University of St.Gallen Switzerland
BI Norwegian Business School Norway
Vienna University of Economics and Business Austria
Jönköping University Sweden
University of Mannheim Germany
Leuphana University of Lüneburg Germany
Copenhagen Business School relative to Stockholm School of Economics Sweden Stockholm School of Economics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Stockholm School of Economics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Copenhagen Business School

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Copenhagen Business School. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Copenhagen Business School with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Copenhagen Business School more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Copenhagen Business School

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Copenhagen Business School at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Copenhagen Business School at the time of their publication.

About Copenhagen Business School

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Copenhagen Business School have published 16.1k papers, which have received a total of 443.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3.4k papers in Strategy and Management, 1.8k papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 1.0k papers in Management of Technology and Innovation, 270 papers in Business and International Management and 1.4k papers in Accounting on the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (1.2k papers), Management and Organizational Studies (1.1k papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (736 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (533 papers), International Business and FDI (529 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (511 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (413 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (361 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Strategy and Management (131.7k citations), Business and International Management (13.5k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (44.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (57.9k citations) and Marketing (47.2k citations). Authors at Copenhagen Business School collaborate with scholars in Denmark, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Organization Studies, Industrial Marketing Management, Research Policy and Journal of Business Ethics. Some of Copenhagen Business School's most productive authors include Nicolai J. Foss, Keld Laursen, Torben Pedersen, Ammon Salter, Majken Schultz, Peter Maskell, Lasse Heje Pedersen, Jan Mouritsen, Klaus E. Meyer and Anders Malmberg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact