International Union for Conservation of Nature
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 187
- Ecology 521
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 235
- Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies 105
- Top scholars
- Jeffrey A. McNeelyThomas M. BrooksSimon N. StuartAna S. L. RodriguesJanice S. ChansonBruce E. YoungJames E. M. WatsonNeil A. Cox
- Journals
- Oryx (63 papers)Conservation Biology (53 papers)Environmental Conservation (38 papers)Science (36 papers)Biological Conservation (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
International Union for Conservation of Nature
1.1k papers receiving 52.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 222
- Ecological Modeling 9.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 12.0k
- Global and Planetary Change 20.6k
- Ecology 21.8k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 6.8k
Countries citing scholars working at International Union for Conservation of Nature
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at International Union for Conservation of Nature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at International Union for Conservation of Nature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Union for Conservation of Nature more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at International Union for Conservation of Nature
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with International Union for Conservation of Nature at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with International Union for Conservation of Nature at the time of their publication.
About International Union for Conservation of Nature
In recent decades, authors affiliated with International Union for Conservation of Nature have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 55.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 187 papers in Ecological Modeling, 521 papers in Ecology, 246 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 423 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 206 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (235 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (206 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (187 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (123 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (105 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (96 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (88 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (58 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (9.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (12.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (20.6k citations), Ecology (21.8k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (6.8k citations). Authors at International Union for Conservation of Nature collaborate with scholars in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Oryx, Conservation Biology, Environmental Conservation, Science and Biological Conservation. Some of International Union for Conservation of Nature's most productive authors include Jeffrey A. McNeely, Thomas M. Brooks, Simon N. Stuart, Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Janice S. Chanson, Bruce E. Young, James E. M. Watson, Neil A. Cox, Robert W. Waller and Jeffrey A. Sayer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.