Chemistry of Life Processes Institute
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 10%
- Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Papers in
- Biomaterials 106
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery 70
-
- Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications 41
- Top scholars
- Michael C. JewettKarl A. ScheidtPhillip B. MessersmithIgal G. SzleiferNeil L. KelleherRichard B. SilvermanJoshua N. LeonardLloyd M. Smith
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (59 papers)Nature Communications (39 papers)ACS Synthetic Biology (37 papers)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (37 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaArgentina
In The Last Decade
Chemistry of Life Processes Institute
1.2k papers receiving 61.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
- Molecular Medicine 2.8k
- Biomaterials 4.7k
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 2.3k
- Organic Chemistry 9.2k
- Molecular Biology 17.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Chemistry of Life Processes Institute
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Chemistry of Life Processes Institute. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Chemistry of Life Processes Institute with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemistry of Life Processes Institute more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Chemistry of Life Processes Institute
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Chemistry of Life Processes Institute at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Chemistry of Life Processes Institute at the time of their publication.
About Chemistry of Life Processes Institute
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Chemistry of Life Processes Institute have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 62.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 106 papers in Biomaterials, 42 papers in Molecular Medicine, 14 papers in Structural Biology, 39 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films and 369 papers in Molecular Biology on the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (81 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (70 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (59 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (56 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (45 papers), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (41 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (36 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (36 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Medicine (2.8k citations), Biomaterials (4.7k citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (2.3k citations), Organic Chemistry (9.2k citations) and Molecular Biology (17.7k citations). Authors at Chemistry of Life Processes Institute collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Argentina and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nature Communications, ACS Synthetic Biology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some of Chemistry of Life Processes Institute's most productive authors include Michael C. Jewett, Karl A. Scheidt, Phillip B. Messersmith, Igal G. Szleifer, Neil L. Kelleher, Richard B. Silverman, Joshua N. Leonard, Lloyd M. Smith, Thomas V. O’Halloran and Daniel T. Cohen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.